ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Oral and Enema of Chloral Hydrate
To compare the clinical sedative effect and safety using 10% chloral hydrate during ophthalmic examinations for oral vs enema group.The patients were randomly divided into two groups (oral group and enema group) using a computer random number generator with a 1:1 allocation (simple randomization, odd number for oral group and even number for enema group).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Point of Care Test of First Voided Urine Compared to Midstream Voided Urine in Primary Care#1140544
- Using Urine Color as a Marker of Hydration Status#910436
- Water Exchange Colonoscopy in Elderly Patients#1171395
- Intravenous (IV) Solutions for Dehydration in Children With Gastroenteritis#981352
- Topical Lidocaine Anesthesia for Nasopharyngeal Sampling#880196
Record · ID 895908
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive