ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique
Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Versus Conventional Treatment#1075012
- Comparing Minimally Invasive Treatments for Pilonidal Disease: LA POPA Trial (Laser And Pit-picking OR Pit-picking Alone)#901119
- Comparison of Duodenal Stenting vs Transpyloric and Duodenal Stenting for Malignant Obstruction#1086884
- Open Fistulectomy vs. Laser Closure for Low Perianal Fistula#981287
- Endoscopic Gastroenteric Anastomosis With New Tissue Apposing Stent in the Management of Antro-pyloroduodenal Obstruction : Evaluation of Feasibility, Efficacy and Tolerance.#914208
Record · ID 896389
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive