ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used as reversible contraceptives. Both copper- and levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing IUDs (LNG-IUDs) are safe,cost-effective in the long term and equally effective compared with tubal sterilization. In addition, the LNG-IUD (Mirena®) provides non contraceptive benefits, such as treatment for menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea and anemia. The current use of IUDs among reproductive-aged women ranges from 8 to 15% worldwide. Reported complications related to IUD insertion are 8.8% insertion failure, 2.8-11.5% cervical problems, 0.2% cervical perforation, 0.2% syncope and 5.8% expulsion. Insertion failures and cervical problems seem to occur more often among women who have never delivered vaginally. Cervical stenosis, an immature or small cervix and a significantly ante- or retroverted position of the uterus, has been described as factors associated with a difficult sounding of the cervical canal or even failure to insert the IUD. Misoprostol is an inexpensive prostaglandin E1-analogue, which is associated with few side effect. More over several have shown the benefit of misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in non pregnant women. Priming with misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy and dilatation and curettage (D\&C) in perimenopausal women resulted in increased cervical dilatation and lower rate of cervical laceration. The effect of misoprostol on the cellular matrix causes dissolution of collagen fiber increasing the amount of fluid in the stroma and consequentially causes cervical effacement. Fear of pain during insertion, however, might prevent some women from choosing IUD and fears of painful and/or difficult placements may lead them to recommend or counsel women on other, less effective methods. Women's perception of pain is multifactorial and likely to be influenced by cultural differences and personal experiences; insertion-related pain is therefore difficult to predict. Nevertheless, factors associated with greater pain include nu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quick Start Insertion of Mirena and ParaGard#806524
- Postplacental Insertion of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) After Cesarean vs. Interval Insertion#883957
- IUCD Insertion in Patients Delivered by Cesarean Section#1125956
- Use of Misoprostol in Case of Insertion Failure of Intrauterine Contraceptives#1007901
- Efficacy and Safety of Etonogestrel + 17β-Estradiol Vaginal Ring and Levonorgestrel-Ethinyl Estradiol Combined Oral Contraceptive in Adult Women at Risk for Pregnancy (MK-8342B-062)#1044642
Record · ID 896834
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive