ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Pulmonary Embolism Treatments
The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with anticoagulation alone versus anticoagulation and mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the Indigo Aspiration System for the treatment of intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study on the Clinical Course Of Pulmonary Embolism#158089
- Air Versus Oxygen for Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism (AIRE)#905958
- Tinzaparin in the Treatment of the Acute Pulmonary Embolism#852239
- Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction computed with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography to predict the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with pulmonary embolism: protocol for a cohort study (PRONOSPECT)#670004
- Contemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a clinical review#129362
Record · ID 897704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive