ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Preemer Trial - Prophylactic Mesh Versus no Mesh in the Midline Emergency Laparotomy Closure for Prevention of Incisional Hernia: a Multi Center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
244 patients, who have an emergency midline laparotomy for any gastrointestinal reason, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio either to mesh group with a retrorectus prophylactic self-gripping mesh or to control group with 4:1 small stitch closure by continuous monofilament suture. They will be followed up at 30 days, 2 and 5 years to detect the incidence of incisional hernia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
- Algorithm for Prophylactic Mesh Use in Emergency Laparotomy.#833277
- Utility of a Supraaponeurotic Mesh as Prophylaxis of the Midline Eventration After an Oncological Colorrectal Resection#994795
- Small Versus Large Bite Closure of Emergency Midline Laparotomy#845687
- Peristomal Mesh for Prophylaxis of Parastomal Hernia#813890
Record · ID 897787
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive