ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effects Of Inversion Table Therapy Vs MT On Pain And Lumbar Flexibility In Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a widespread yet difficult-to-manage and treat public health condition with a significant treatment failure rate. Both inversion table therapy and mulligan techniques are very effective in reducing low back pain. A number of literature supports the effectiveness of both techniques individually but there is no literature available that provide comparison between these two techniques.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mulligan Mobilization Techniques for Non-Specific Low Back Pain#1010705
- Effect of Mulligan Mobilization in Chronic Non-Spesific Low Back Pain#881804
- Investigation of Immediate, Short and Long Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Techniques in Nonspesific Chronic Low Back Pain#847756
- Effects of Slump Stretching vs Lumbar Mobilization With Exercises in Relieving Non-radiculating Low Back Pain#993898
- Effectiveness of Core Stabilization Exercise in Patients With Subacute Non-Specific Low Back Pain#1030034
Record · ID 898308
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive