ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Precise AI-Controlled Radiofrequency Versus Biofeedback-Electrical Stimulation in Women With Myofascial Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Comparative Study
Study Summary: Comparison of Two Treatments for Female Myofascial Pelvic Pain Syndrome The goal of this study is to compare two treatment methods-precise AI-controlled radiofrequency therapy versus biofeedback combined with electrical stimulation-for their clinical effectiveness in female Myofascial Pelvic Pain Syndrome . The study also evaluates the differences between the two therapies in relieving pain, improving sexual function, restoring pelvic floor muscle strength, and reducing anxiety. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does precise AI-controlled radiofrequency therapy outperform biofeedback combined with electrical stimulation in relieving pain and reducing pelvic floor hypertonicity? Do the two therapies differ in their effects on improving patients' sexual function and anxiety levels? Which treatment regimen is more effective in restoring pelvic floor muscle strength and stability? Researchers randomly assigned 70 female MPPS patients into two groups (35 patients each). One group received precise AI-controlled radiofrequency therapy (5 sessions, completed over approximately 12 weeks), while the other group received biofeedback combined with electrical stimulation (10 sessions, completed over approximately 3 weeks). Treatment outcomes were compared using Glazer pelvic floor surface electromyography (sEMG) assessment, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and anxiety scores. Participants will: Receive pelvic floor physical therapy for 3 to 12 weeks, depending on their group assignment Undergo Glazer pelvic floor surface electromyography (sEMG) assessment before and after treatment to measure resting tension and muscle strength of the pelvic floor muscles Complete pain (VAS), sexual function (FSFI), and anxiety (HADS-A) questionnaires before and after treatment Be guided throughout the treatment by professional pelvic floor rehabilitation therapists, who will adjust parameters (e.g., current intens
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Photobiomodulation for Myofascial Pelvic Pain#883124
- Pelvic Floor Magnetic Stimulation in Men With Radical Prostatectomy#908145
- Therapeutic-educational Physiotherapy on Pain, Physical-functionality and Quality of Life in Women With Endometriosis.#887814
- Evaluating the Management of Chronic Pelvic Girdle Pain#901992
- Efficacy of Resistive Capacitive Monopolar Radiofrequency in the Physiotherapeutic Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain: RCT#916874
Record · ID 898454
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive