PhilArchive
open access
Falsificationism and Research Programmes: Impact of Popper and Lakatos on Economic Methodology
In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosian methodology of scientific research programmes [MSRP] on economic methodology and philosophy of economics. The central thesis I maintain is that neither Popper's falsificationism nor Lakatos' MSRP offers [philosophy of] economics a proper condition for the reception or rejection of economic theories.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Popper, Basic Statements and the Quine-Duhem Thesis#772866
- Caveat emptor: Economics and contemporary philosophy of science#738766
- Conjeturas y modelos: acerca de K. Popper y la teoría económica#944881
- Falsificationism Overextended: Popper's Category Misidentification of Marx and Its Epistemological Consequences#690602
- My View on K. Popper's Criterion#91490
Record · ID 89853
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive