ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Short Vs Standard Length Myotomy in Achalasia
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (non-inferiority study) is to evaluate the outcomes of 4 cm short myotomy compared to the 8 cm standard length myotomy in Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for patients with achalasia. We hypothesize that a shorter myotomy with POEM will have the same clinical efficacy as standard length myotomy based on patient-reported Eckardt score with shorter procedure times and reduced complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- POEM: Long vs Short Myotomy for Achalasia. RCT#1030902
- Comprehensive Evaluation of AI Consent Forms in Otolaryngologic Surgery.#402635
- Optimal Level of PEEP in Protective One-lung Ventilation#904303
- Randomized Assessment of Devices Used to Prevent Post-operative Hemorrhagic Risk in Endonasal Surgery#842127
- Communicating Risks: Consent for Lumbar Puncture#871381
Record · ID 899259
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive