ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of EUS vs MRCP for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis
MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Acute Cholecystitis With Concomitant Choledocholithiasis: Unicentric Study of Prevalence and Predictive Factors#982735
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Using Liverspecific Oral Contrast Agent in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients#1151461
- GALLVIA Trial: EUS-Guided vs Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis#1172733
- Automated Screening Device to Detect MTMROP#842064
- Performance of Lung MRI Combined to Synthetic CT in the Follow-up of Lung Nodules#829154
Record · ID 899449
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive