ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Shacklock Neural Mobilization vs. McKenzie on Pain and Functional Disability in Lumbar Radiculopathy
This randomized comparative trial evaluates the efficacy of Shacklock neural mobilization versus the McKenzie extension principle in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The study aims to compare both interventions in terms of their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional disability. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The trial seeks to inform evidence-based physiotherapeutic approaches for managing lumbar radiculopathy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Different Treatment Methods Applied to Spine in Chronic Non-Spesific Low Back Pain#1060611
- McKenzie vs Pilates Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain#802099
- Patient Profiling and Outcome Assessment in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and/or Leg Pain#1087985
- Effects of Neural Flossing and PNF on Lumbar Radiculopathy#839537
- The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis#812011
Record · ID 899767
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive