ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing the Effect of Spinal Bupivacaine Versus Spinal Prilocaine on Maternal Blood Pressure in Cesarean Section
one of the most common complications associated with spinal anesthesia is hypotension, which can have adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. The present study compare prilocaine versus bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia on hypotension and there effect on maternal outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intensive Versus Standard Treatment for Spinal Anesthesia-induced Hypotension#1087678
- Evaluation the Perfusion of Uterus and Lower Extremities During Cesarean Section With NIRS and Color Doppler#1150017
- Evaluate Efficacy Levobupivacaine 0.125% Versuss Ropivacaine 0.2% in Hemodynamic Alterations in Labor and Fetal Repercussions#1030574
- EFFECT OF DIFFERENT NOREPINPHRINE APPLICATION METHODS IN CAESARIANES ON HYPOTENSION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA#1088173
- Undetectable Hypotension Episodes in Cesarean Section#837097
Record · ID 900257
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive