ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Relative Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Cervical Manipulation, Mobilisation and the Activator Instrument in Patients With Sub-acute Non-specific Neck Pain: a Pragmatic Randomised Trial
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in the treatment of subacute non-specific neck pain. The secondary purpose was to describe any adverse effects of these treatments.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Thrust Manipulation vs. Non-thrust Mobilizations for Mechanical Neck Pain#853601
- Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain#842956
- Different Types of Manual Therapy Techniques in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain#889171
- Efficacy Of Gross Myofascial Release With Neural Mobilization Versus Neural Mobilization Alone On Pain, Functional Limitations, And Cervical Range Of Motion In Cervical Radiculopathy#874471
- Mckenzie Versus Maitland Cervical Mobilization Technique in Management of Non-specific Neck Pain.#861091
Record · ID 900432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive