ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cost-utility Analysis of Outpatient Manual Vacuum Aspiration Versus Operating Room Electric Aspiration for the Management of First-trimester Miscarriage
The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Manual Vacuum Aspiration and Dilatation and Curettage for Endometrial Sampling Adequacy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding#1172610
- Operative Hysteroscopy Versus Suction Curettage for Surgical Termination of Early Pregnancy Loss (Miscarriage)#836622
- An African, Multi-centre Evaluation of Patient Care and Clinical Outcomes for Paediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery#1074815
- Management of Women With an Incomplete Miscarriage#1161675
- Comparative Study Between Preoperative and Postoperative Rectal Misoprostol#1044462
Record · ID 900464
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive