PhilArchive
open access
Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment
That Kant sees the faculties of imagination and judgment as closely related is not controversial. Yet precisely how they relate to each other, especially across his Critical philosophy, is less clear. In this article, I consider the relationship between what Kant calls the “power of imagination” (Einbildungskraft) and the “power of judgment” (Urteilskraft). I argue for the following claim: insofar as the power of judgment is the faculty of thinking particulars under universals, the power of imagination is the faculty of producing and providing particulars for judgment—either to reflect on or to subsume under universals. Such an account reveals that our capacity for imagination is intimately bound up with our capacity to judge.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self#770765
- Das unendliche Urteil der Aufklärung: veranschaulicht am kantischen Raum-Zeit-Modell#718018
- Kant’s Transcendental Turn to the Object#71455
- Kant’s Religion and the Reflective Judgment#740338
- The Transcendental Object, Experience, and the Thing in Itself#757647
Record · ID 90048
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive