ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Trial Comparing Two Protocols Using Intravenous (IV) Hydromorphone
The purpose of this study is to compare two opioid protocols ("H2O" and "1+1") for the treatment of acute severe pain in the emergency department. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the "H2O" protocol will be more efficacious than the "1+1" protocol in Emergency Department patients aged 21-64 years. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each arm who choose to forgo additional pain medication at 60 minutes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quantity of Opioids for Acute Pain and Limit Unused Medication#866948
- Spinal Anesthetic for Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery - Intrathecal Morphine or Hydromorphone#806125
- Longitudinal Dose Trajectory Among Patients Tapering Long-Term Opioids.#409511
- A Study to Evaluate the Abuse Potential of Oxymorphone Compared to Other Mu Opioid Agonists.#865422
- Comparison of A Single Dose Combination of Methadone and Morphine With Morphine Alone for Treating Post-operative Pain#844284
Record · ID 900606
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive