ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs. Abdominal Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer
The purpose of the trial is to determine whether robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in a fast track program gives a faster recovery postoperatively, causes less tissue damage and less effects on the immunological system, and is health economically cost-effective.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy#995354
- Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomy Compared on Short and Long Term Outcomes#895622
- Robotic vs Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Abdominopelvic Cancers#981716
- Medico-economic Comparison of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy Via Laparotomy#889470
- Study Evaluating the Success Rate of Outpatient Management of the Total Benign Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared to Each of the Two Laparoscopic Routes (Conventional and Robot-assisted).#833538
Record · ID 901541
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive