ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Standard Implants With Bone Regeneration vs Short Implants
A study designed as a randomized controlled trial of parallel group design will be conducted at the Dental clinic of the University of Valencia to compare, considering different parameters, the rehabilitation with dental implants of atrophic posterior mandibles or maxillae using short implants or longer implants with vertical bone regeneration with GBR. The hypothesis of the study is that both treatment options will be successful to rehabilitate atrophic posterior mandibles or maxillae. Moreover, more surgical complications will be encountered in the bone regeneration group.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study on OsseoSpeed™ Implants in Patients Missing 2-5 Teeth in the Posterior Lower Jaw, Restored With Permanent Teeth Attached 6-7 Weeks Later#827046
- Different Implant Positions for Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture#916032
- Bone Quality and Quantity Following Guided Bone Regeneration#871814
- Case Series Evaluation of a Short Dental Implant#889029
- Study Comparing OsseoSpeed™ Implants of Two Different Lengths in the Upper and Lower Posterior Jaw#1162947
Record · ID 901606
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive