ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Advanced vs Standard Hemodynamic Monitoring During Propofol Sedation for ERCP: A Prospective Study
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there is a difference in hemodynamic events requiring intervention between patients monitored with advanced hemodynamic monitoring using the MostCare system and those monitored with standard monitoring alone during propofol sedation for ERCP procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Use of Perfusion Index Change as a Predictor of Hypotension During Propofol Sedation in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study#881981
- Balanced Propofol Sedation During Upper Endoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients#829972
- Nurse-Led BIS-Guided Sedation Protocol in Pediatric Intensive Care#843307
- Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation#1046862
- Safety and Efficacy of Fospropofol vs Propofol During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.#1096479
Record · ID 901635
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive