PhilArchive
open access
Collective Deliberation as Epistemic Cooperation
In this paper, I suggest that collective deliberation processes should be seen as cooperative epistemic activities. After considering a well-known argument for why they cannot result from a majoritarian aggregating procedure, I focus on the limitations of a functionalist approach to collective agency and suggest that Tomasello’s approach to cooperation can shed light on how collective deliberation works. I then argue that understanding collective deliberation in terms of epistemic cooperation sheds light on both the structure and the normative implications of collective deliberation processes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation#715977
- Democratic Deliberation and Social Choice: A Review#748734
- Democratic Consensus as an Essential Byproduct#735199
- Against Corporate Responsibility#708955
- Motivated Reasoning in Political Information Processing: The Death Knell of Deliberative Democracy?#763166
Record · ID 90168
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive