ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intrauterine Balloon (Bakri©) Versus Uterine Tamponade With Chitosan Gauze (Celox PPH©) in the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage Refractory to Medical Treatmen
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is defined as blood loss of more than 500 mL after vaginal delivery or more than 1000 mL after cesarean section, but severe PPH is typically identified when blood loss exceeds 1000 mL regardless of delivery mode. The initial management of PPH includes the administration of uterotonics such as oxytocin, methylergometrine, and tranexamic acid. However, a subset of patients remains unresponsive to medical therapy, necessitating second-line interventions to avoid escalation to invasive procedures such as uterine artery embolization or peripartum hysterectomy. An intrauterine balloon tamponade device (Bakri©), is commonly used as a mechanical method to control uterine bleeding by exerting direct pressure on the uterine walls. Its use has been widely adopted and incorporated into international guidelines due to its relative ease of use and safety profile. Despite its effectiveness, the failure rate of Bakri balloon placement can range from 20% to 40%, especially in cases of coagulopathy or diffuse atony. Gauzes with a chitosan-based hemostatic dressing (Celox PPH ©) , has been extensively used in trauma settings and is increasingly being explored for surgical and obstetric applications. Its mechanism involves promoting clot formation independent of the clotting cascade, making it potentially beneficial in patients with coagulopathies. Preliminary data and case reports suggest that Celox PPH© may be effective in controlling intrauterine bleeding when used as a packing material after vaginal or cesarean delivery, but no high-quality randomized controlled trial has yet compared it directly with standard interventions. Given the clinical need for alternative second-line treatments for PPH unresponsive to medical therapy, this study proposes a head-to-head comparison of the Bakri balloon and Celox gauze. The findin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Uterine Tamponade for Treatment of Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage#877920
- Intramuscular Oxytocics: A Randomised Control Trial#863820
- Membrane Sweeping Versus Transcervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Women With Previous Caesarean Delivery#873410
- Can we Use Intravenous Injection of Tranexamic Acid in Routine Practice With Active Management of the Third Stage of Labor?#877558
- Intrauterine adhesions and prior use of a progestin-releasing intrauterine device#405072
Record · ID 901703
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive