ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Safety & Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl & Midazolam in the Pediatric Emergency Room
The hypothesis is that intranasal dexmedetomidine will provide significantly more effective analgesia and anxiolysis for subjects undergoing a simple laceration repair when compared to either intranasal fentanyl or intranasal midazolam. Additional hypotheses include that there will be 1) no significant increase in adverse effects between drugs and 2) significantly higher satisfaction rates for both subject experience and ease of laceration repair based on structured, proceduralist feedback.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl to Prevent Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pins Application#1171499
- Dexmedetomidine vs. Propofol for Cataract Surgery#893283
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation#903986
- The Effects of Dexmedetomidine to Postoperative Awakening and Extubation-related Changes in Blood Pressure#992587
- Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Fentanyl for Term Neonates on Mechanical Ventilation#1125047
Record · ID 901866
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive