PhilArchive
open access
Towards an ethics of pronatalism in South Korea (and beyond)
East Asian countries such as South Korea have recently made headlines for experimenting with different methods to incentivise people to have (more) children, in a bid to reverse declining birth rates. Many such incentives—child benefits, cash bonuses, dating events, and so on—appear morally innocuous at first glance. I will demonstrate in this analysis, however, that they amount to stopgap measures which reveal fundamental shortcomings with the way various nation states are approaching the so-called ‘problem’ of fertility decline.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- South Korea’s Demographic Dilemma: The Birth Rate Enigma#1153876
- Tamil Nadu's Cradle Baby Scheme - How One Policy Saved Thousands of Girls#264463
- The Fertility Conversion Gap: Marriage Bottlenecks, Opportunity Costs, and the Limits of Pronatalist Policy in Singapore#681804
- Long Term Impact of Induced Abortion#858074
- Population, Economy and Becoming Parents: Reproduction Needs Survival First#101865
Record · ID 90198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive