ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Better Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy Evaluation of Stenting (BLUES)
This multi-center trial is being completed to compare patient outcomes related to the Imajin silicone stent in comparison to non-silicone polyurethane stents after ureteroscopy. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the Imajin silicone stent or a non-silicone stent. In addition, the participants will complete questionnaires and have follow-up information collected (approximately 60 days after surgery). The trial hypothesizes that a ureteral stent made of silicone, will have superior outcomes when compared to non-silicone stents.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Stent Omission After Ureteroscopy and Lithotripsy in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative#825957
- Occlusion Balloon vs. 5FR Ureteral Catheter#837013
- Treatment Persistence Among Patients With Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Secondary Data Analysis in Asia Oceania#906319
- Clinical Trial of Sacral Neuromodulation for Treatment of Refractory Overactive Bladder (OAB)#856063
- Trial of Two Techniques to Assess Postoperative Voiding Function#834548
Record · ID 902084
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive