ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Universal Composites in Posterior Teeth
The aim of this randomized, prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical performance of a universal light-curing, ultra-fine particle hybrid composite with a new version of this product produced by the same manufacturer in Class 1 and Class 2 lesions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations#1087735
- Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth#887652
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Restoring of Primary Molars#1094930
- Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results#812237
- Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria#886572
Record · ID 902425
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive