ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy for benign indication is one of the most common surgical procedures in women. Numerous reviews and guidelines recommend the vaginal approach for benign hysterectomy, but the proportion of laparoscopic (and robotic) hysterectomies is increasing. This study will compare a range of clinical and subjective outcomes of vaginal vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Outcomes include operating time, postoperative recovery, return to work as well as cosmesis, quality of life and sexual health.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Study of Blood Loss in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy by Ligation the Uterine Arteries in Different Techniques.#1162943
- Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse#1103302
- Outcomes on Abdominal Versus Vaginal Morcellation At Time of Hysterectomy#1112024
- Use of the Enseal Intrument for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy#1059652
- Standard Tubal Ligation Versus Salpingectomy for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery#897599
Record · ID 902532
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive