ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Two Different Types of Luteal Phase Support in Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer and Its Effect on Pregnancy Rates
The aim of the study is to compare the pregnancy rate between women treated with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist together with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) and standard luteal support with progesterone following transfer of frozen embryos in in-vitro-fertilization (IVF) natural cycles.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Supplementation in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles#311019
- Modified Luteal Support for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer - A Prospective Study#831789
- GnRH for Luteal Support in IVF/ICSI/FET Cycles#886672
- Endometrial Preparation in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles#853008
- Natural Cycle/Progesterone Fortified Protocol for Endometrial Preparation for Frozen/Thawed Embryo Transfer#907852
Record · ID 902575
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive