ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Accuracy of Intraoral Photogrammetry vs Optical Scanners for Immediate Full-Arch Implant Loading
This prospective in vivo clinical trial evaluates and compares the accuracy (trueness) and scanning time of intraoral photogrammetry scanners (IPS) versus conventional intraoral optical scanners (IOS) for immediate full-arch implant impressions. The reference standard will be a verified conventional splinted open-tray impression taken at the uncovering stage. Sixty edentulous arches receiving 4-6 implants will be included. Linear, angular, and 3D Euclidean deviations will be calculated to assess accuracy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trueness of complete arch intraoral implant scans using splinted and non-splinted scan bodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis#269695
- Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models#893652
- Morphological Characteristics of Anterior Maxillary Bone and Dynamic Navigation in Full-Arch Implant Placement#857482
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Dental Implants Installed Between 2004 and 2010#803512
- Efficiency of Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT)#891525
Record · ID 902717
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive