ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Comparison of Two Colonoscopic Withdrawal Techniques
This study will compare two strategies for colonoscope withdrawal, using polyp detection as the primary outcome measure, to determine the optimal withdrawal strategy. Null Hypothesis: On withdrawal of the colonoscope, examining patients with dynamic position change does not yield more polyps than the supine position. Alternative Hypothesis: On withdrawal of the colonoscope, examining the patients with dynamic position change improves polyp detection compared to the supine position.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Extra Wide Field of View Lens Study#890853
- Panoramic Screening by Complete Colonoscopy in the Management of Colorectal Adenomas#828764
- Implementation of Optical Diagnosis of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps: DISCARD3 Study (Incorporating AI-DETECT)#885274
- Colorectal Polyp Discrimination Using High-Definition Narrow Band Imaging#979442
- Piecemeal Resection and Advanced Histology Independently Predict Local Recurrence After Colorectal Snare-based Endoscopic Resection: a Time-to-event Cohort Study#835873
Record · ID 903477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive