PhilArchive
open access
Addendum: Reconciling Determinism and Meaning in The Relative Framework
Some questions emerge not from opposition, but from reflection, the kind that arises when two parts of a system, developed independently, seem to speak past one another: “If choice is an illusion, as claimed in the reactive model of consciousness, how can meaning, which in earlier work is described as a product of negotiation between self and world, hold any ground?” At first glance, this seems to challenge the coherence of the framework. However, on closer inspection, it reveals a layered compatibility between the experience of meaning and the deterministic structures that underlie conscious activity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bridging interoception and time perspective: toward an embodied model of consciousness.#25801
- Possibility Precedes Actuality#772108
- Representational Structures in Consciousness#95695
- Previderntism: The Logic of Choice in a Scripted Cosmos#73732
- An Action-First Account of Episodic Memory#706292
Record · ID 90469
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive