ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Direct vs. Seldinger Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Difficult Radial Access in Cardiac Surgery
Radial artery cannulation is a routine procedure for invasive hemodynamic monitoring for patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery patients. Although ultrasound (USG) guidance is known to improve success rates, there is limited data comparing the efficacy of the 'Direct' versus 'Seldinger' techniques specifically in patients with anticipated difficult radial access. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of USG-guided Direct cannulation and USG-guided Seldinger techniques in adult patients with anticipated difficult radial arterial cannulation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- U/S Guided vs. Traditional Palpation for Radial Artery Cannulation#1093782
- Randomized Comparison of Distal Radial Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention#887945
- Nurse vs Physician Artery Cannulation#897659
- Proximal and Distal Radial Artery Cannulation in Children#838806
- UltraSound Guided Distal Radial Artery vS Conventional Transradial Access for Interventional Coronary Angiography#868103
Record · ID 904700
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive