ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Continuing Lamivudine Versus Switching to Entecavir in Patients Who Achieved Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA
This is a randomized, open-labelled, prospective 96-week study comparing the antiviral efficacy and safety of switching to entecavir 0.5mg QD from lamivudine versus maintaining lamivudine 100mg QD treatment in CHB patients currently receiving lamivudine monotherapy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When to stop antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B#955643
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of BRII-179, BRII-835 and PEG-IFNα in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infection (ENHANCE)#1033208
- Tenofovir Monotherapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Had Achieved Complete Viral Suppression on Entecavir Plus Tenofovir#840845
- Long-Term Lamivudine Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B#992464
- Efficacy of VTP-300 in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection#307314
Record · ID 905840
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive