ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Bioimpedance vs Clinical Methods in Guiding Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients
The investigators developed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare strict volume control using bioimpedance (using the BCM - Body Composition Monitor device) versus traditional clinical volume control in hemodialysis patients and the impact on mortality, hydration status, blood pressure values and arterial stiffness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ultrafiltration Profiling and Outcomes Among Individuals on Maintenance Hemodialysis#267960
- A Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Hemodialysis Filters#872962
- The Effect of On-line Hemodiafiltratrion on Nutritional Status and Body Composition#1032397
- Effect of Educution in Control Nutrition and Fluid Control of Hemodialysis Patient#158085
- Investigation of the Effects of Medium Cut-off Dialyzers Versus High-Flux Dialyzers on Clinical and Laboratory Parameters of Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients#870326
Record · ID 906185
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive