ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Artificial Intelligence Segmentation Versus Conventional Technique
To compare the accuracy of surgical guided implant using AI tooth segmentation of the CBCT alone without intraoral scan to fabricate the implant guide versus conventional technique by alignment the CBCT and intraoral scan to fabricate the implant guide in posterior implant.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry#802400
- Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.#867012
- Développement et validation de méthodes pour une évaluation individualisée de la sécurité IRM d’implants actifs#142525
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Predicting the Integrity of Interlobar Fissures Based on Chest Image AI Technology#1150888
- Jumping Gap Dimension at Maxillary Teeth: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study#1088737
Record · ID 906604
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive