ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Conventional Versus Point-of-care Based Coagulation Management
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of two different algorithms for coagulation management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery suffering from increased bleeding tendency. Algorithm 1 is based on conventional coagulation analyses (INR, aPTT, platelet count, fibrinogen concentration,...) and Algorithm 2 is based on thrombelastometry using the ROTEM-device and impedance aggregometry using the Multiplate device.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Perioperative Coagulation Management in Cardiac Surgery.#832742
- Comparison of Two Point-of-care Devices for Viscoelastic Hemostasis Assays#1073873
- Evaluation of Novel Point of Care Coagulation System in Pregnant Women#896660
- Point-of-Care Testing of Coagulation in Patients Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants 2#148673
- Primary and Secondary Hemostasis in Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery#882521
Record · ID 907065
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive