ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
On-Pump vs. Off-Pump CABG in High-Risk Patients (EuroSCORE 6+)
Previous studies comparing on-pump and off-pump operating strategy did only partially demonstrate benefits of the off-pump myocardial revascularisation.In primary end-points (MI, death, renal failure, and so on) there was no significant difference, but in secondary end-points we observed benefits resulting for patients. We would like to show the benefit of the method without extracorporeal circulation in patients with higher and hight operation risk, coming from EuroSCORE classification system (6 points and more).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Percutaneously Delivered Automated Continual Fluid Removal System in Patients With Advanced Diuretic-Resistant Heart Failure#909660
- Re-infusion of Unwashed Shed Blood During Off-pump Surgery#805389
- Removal Peripheral Intravenous Catheters According to Clinical Signs or Every 96 Hours: A Non Inferiority Study#800941
- High Intensity PreHab Before Major Abdominal Surgery#1058191
- Tissue Expansion in Breast Reconstruction Without Drains#1164800
Record · ID 907349
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive