ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency
Although there are different ways of performing genicular nerve radiofrequency on knee pain, to our knowledge, there is no stuies comparing the clinical outcomes of a parallel technique vs. a perpendicular technique. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these both techniques.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients With Gonarthrosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study#1170711
- Efficacy of Pulse Radiofrequency Treatment in Patients With Coxarthrosis#904313
- Paraspinal NMES and Spinopelvic Alignment After Knee Arthroplasty#966546
- Adductor Canal Block With IPACK Versus Genicular Nerves Block With IPACK for Post-operative Analgesia#841695
- Neurodynamic Study#805431
Record · ID 907666
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive