ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
In-person vs. Remote Wellness Support
The study team will use components of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to compare Cognitive Adaptation Training (CAT) to Remotely delivered Cognitive Adaptation Training (R-CAT) 1-9 within a managed care organization (MCO), targeting members with serious mental illness (SMI) needing assistance with the regular taking of medication.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pilot Feasibility Study of Remote Problem Management Plus for Adults Affected by COVID-19#805432
- Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) in Older Adults : Cognitive Correlates, Response Profile, and a Comparison Between Remote vs. In-Person Administration#187915
- Integrating Community and Digital Support Through Social Prescribing to Improve Mental Health in Rural Older Adults in South Korea: Quasi-Experimental Study.#157870
- Metacognitive Training in Ultra-high Risk#1030952
- Remotely Resolving Psychological Stress (Remote RePS)#1100690
Record · ID 907675
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive