ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Assessment of Three Basic Progressive Lens Designs
This clinical trial investigates the differences between three different progressive addition lens designs. It is a non-invasive double-masked randomized clinical investigation. For this study, 80 participants will be recruited.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- To Compare the Progressive Cracking Technique and Conventional Chop Technique on Corneal Endothelial Cells in Patients With Hard Nucleus Cataract#858132
- Investigation of the Accuracy of an Automated Refractor to Provide Well-tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions#831013
- Comparison of ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day Multifocal and DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus® Multifocal#908095
- Comparison of Two Biometers in Dense Cataracts#873836
- Clinical Validation of Biofinity Toric MTO (Made To Order) Lenses#902571
Record · ID 907820
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive