ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Parameters in the Application of Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid 1.8% and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Periodontal Regeneration.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness in periodontal regeneration of cross-linked hyaluronic acid at 1.8% (Hyadent BG®) with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) in periodontal bone defects evaluating their clinical and radiographic variables.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Clinical Assessment of Adjunctive Hyaluronic Acid With 3D Printed Versus Milled CAD CAM Provisional Dental Restorations on Active Periodontal Status and Surface Roughness and Biocompatibility#905279
- Flapless Periodontal Regeneration Using Hyaluronic Acid Versus Enamel Matrix Derivative#850924
- Hyaluronan in the Treatment of Residual Pockets in Periodontitis Patients.#841350
- Regeneration of Human Intrabony Defects With rhFGF-2/HA#882093
- Early Healing of Oral Soft Tissues: a Clinical and Biomolecular Analysis. Part III#1031360
Record · ID 907862
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive