ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Study Comparing Regional Anesthetic Blocks and Periarticular Infiltration for the Management of Post-operative Pain After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
To compare two methods of post-operative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. There is a perception that the periarticular injections may not be as effective in controlling post-operative pain. Both methods are current standard of care. The investigators want to compare the outcomes of each when patients are randomized to one of the methods compared to the other method of post-operative pain control.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- US-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Different Volumes on Postoperative Pain in Hip Replacement Surgeries#1057687
- The Influence of Local Infiltration Analgesia by Catheter in Postoperative Control Pain After Total Hip Replacement#858979
- Management of Postoperative Pain in France: a Prospective National Study#884100
- Effects of Lacosamide on Post-operative Opioid Requirements After a Total Hip Arthroplasty:#1045150
- Combined PENG and LFCN Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty#811702
Record · ID 908090
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive