ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Fluid Loading in Abdominal Surgery: Saline Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch (FLASH Study)
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate whether the type of fluid (0.9% saline or 6% Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4) in the context of an individualized goal-directed fluid therapy is associated with a difference in morbidity and mortality within the first 14 days in patients at moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications after abdominal surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Validations of New cut-of for the Stratification of Postoperative Complications,Drains Management#912673
- REstrictive Versus LIbEral Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery#893123
- Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) System and Postoperative Outcome After High-risk Abdominal Surgery#842370
- Fluid Loading Countermeasures#1009105
- Increasing Enteral Protein Intake in Critically Ill Trauma and Surgical Patients#1072138
Record · ID 909358
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive