ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Outcomes of a Trifocal IOL in Post-refractive Patients
To compare the prediction error of ORA vs formula for post-LASIK cataract patients when PanOptix IOL was implanted. Using post-operative outcomes to determine if preoperative IOL calculations, including Barrett TK, Barrett Universal II, Hill RBF, ASCRS post-refractive calculator, or intraoperative aberrometry is more accurate when the two methods disagree in patients who have had previous refractive surgery undergo cataract surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) Aberrometry Outcomes#1128307
- Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group Comparison of Two Refractive EDOF Intraocular Lenses: Johnson & Johnson Tecnis PureSee Versus 1stQ Comfort Z-EDOF#887135
- Comparision of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Between Two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses#881419
- Surgical Outcomes After Routine Cataract Extraction & Implantation of a Conventional or Spheric Intraocular Lens#1087434
- Outcomes of Bilateral Implantation of an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens#826277
Record · ID 909359
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive