ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Light vs Heavy Weighted Mesh Repair in Primary Abdominal Hernia in Terms of Surgical Site Infection
This study compares the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair using either light or heavy-weighted polypropylene mesh. The study aims to determine which mesh type results in fewer SSIs, thereby guiding future surgical approaches to abdominal hernia repair.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias#879027
- Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair#1008117
- Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh#825892
- Prophylactic Mesh to Reduce The Incidence of Ventral Hernia#1102698
- Protocol for the mesh matters project: evaluating the efficacy of suture mesh vs. planar mesh in small ventral hernia repair - a randomized, blinded multicenter study.#423170
Record · ID 909888
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive