ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Study Comparing Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel to Duac® Topical Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
The objective of this study is to compare the relative efficacy and safety of the test formulation Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Topical Gel (Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc.) to the marketed formulation Duac® Topical Gel (Clindamycin 1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 5%) (Stiefel) in the treatment of the inflamed lesions of acne vulgaris. Both the test and reference formulations will also be compared to a placebo formulation to test for superiority.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Generic Clindamycin/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel Versus Onexton Gel in Acne Vulgaris#835605
- Trial of Clindamycin / Benzoyl Peroxide Gel in Subjects With Acne#884783
- Evaluate Therapeutic Equivalence and Safety of Two Clindamycin Phosphate and Benzoyl Peroxide Gels in Acne Vulgaris#969585
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adapalene-Clindamycin Combination Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris#892737
- Compound Adapalene and Clindamycin Hydrochloride Gel in Treatment of Patients With Acne#895707
Record · ID 910257
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive