Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Ontology and Operability of Pre-Judgment Structure — Resetting the Unit of Reproducibility in Humanities, Social Sciences, and Human Sciences —

Hattori, Takezo
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
In the humanities, social sciences, and human sciences, it is often assumed that reproducibility, as required in natural sciences, cannot be established because their objects involve human action, judgment, meaning, and value. As a result, knowledge in these fields is frequently regarded as unshareable in a strict sense. However, in everyday and institutional contexts, people continuously share judgments, coordinate behavior, and demand explanations for the grounds of those judgments. This suggests that judgment operates with some form of shareable structure. This paper does not attempt to apply natural-scientific reproducibility to these fields. Instead, it redefines the unit of reproducibility by examining what elements are fixed prior to judgment and how those elements are shared among third parties.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 91041
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive