ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Radical Surgery Versus Non-Surgery in Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis After Successful Conversion Therapy
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if radical surgery improves prognosis and quality of life compared with continued standard non-surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis who have achieved successful conversion therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does radical surgery prolong overall survival in patients who achieve successful conversion therapy? * Does radical surgery provide better or at least comparable quality of life and safety outcomes compared with continued standard treatment? Researchers will compare radical surgery versus continued standard systemic treatment to see whether radical surgery provides superior clinical benefit for patients after successful conversion therapy. Participants will: * Initial laparoscopic exploration confirms CY0P1 or CY1P1, absence of distant organ metastasis, a PCI ≤ 20, and presence or absence of ascites. * Receive conversion therapy (chemotherapy, targeted/immunotherapy, intraperitoneal therapy, etc.) per standard guidelines, tailored to the patient's condition and molecular-pathological profile * If clinical conversion is confirmed, undergo a second laparoscopic exploration to verify successful conversion * If successful conversion is confirmed (peritoneal lesions cleared or markedly regressed with negative biopsy, no ascites or distant metastases, R0-resectable primary tumor, and improved patient condition), be randomized 1:1 to either the surgery group or the standard treatment group * In the surgery group, undergo curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy during the second laparoscopy, followed by adjuvant therapy and maintenance treatment * In the standard treatment group, continue systemic therapy without surgery, with maintenance treatment and salvage surgery permitted if clinically indicated * Complete quality of life questionnaires at predefined time points * Be followed up for survival, disease progression, adverse events and medical resource use outcomes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Preoperative Dose-dense Chemotherapy With Weekly Cisplatin, Epirubicin and Paclitaxel to Treat Patients With Locally Gastric Cancer#886550
- Efficacy of HIPEC in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After radIcal Gastrectomy With D2#1060429
- Phase III Study to Compare Perioperative Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin Combined With S-1(SOX) Versus SOX or Oxaliplatin With Capecitabine (XELOX) as Post-operative Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma With D2 Dissection#966564
- Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Systemic Chemotherapy After Curative Resection of Serosa-positive Gastric Cancer#1058652
- Comparison of the Efficiency Between Intraoperative and Postoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Docetaxel Combine Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer#1047144
Record · ID 910535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive