ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Solitaire to Embotrap to Treat Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke (SOLTRAP Study)
The primary aim of this study is to assess if there is a difference in first pass reperfusion between the two devices. This is a randomized prospective study to assess if there is a difference in first pass reperfusion at two centers with large mechanical thrombectomy volumes. Data will also be collected on time-to treatment, outcomes and hemorrhagic complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparable efficacy and safety of bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.#30655
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke With a Medium or Distal Arterial Occlusion#684911
- European Registry on the ACE Reperfusion Catheters and the Penumbra System in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke#1113628
- Efficacy of Pulmozyme® on Arterial Recanalization in Post-thrombectomy Patients Managed for Ischemic Stroke (NETs-target)#1152187
- RECO Flow Restoration Device Versus Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy Study#837572
Record · ID 911024
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive