ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room Versus Outpatient Settings
This is an observational prospective monocentric study which aims to compare operative hysteroscopies performed in the operating room under general or loco-regional anesthesia and those performed outside the operating room (outpatient operative hysteroscopy). The primary outcome is the success rate of the procedure. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, complications, and time to return to work.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A retrospective audit of out-patient hysteroscopy at Tygerberg hospital over a five-year period.#197721
- Mini-hysteroscopy Versus Conventional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Patients Undergoing Office Hysteroscopy#869057
- Use of the Enseal Intrument for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy#1059652
- Day-case Versus Inpatient Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy#982514
- Hysterectomy - A Regional Intervention Study#1075723
Record · ID 911338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive