ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Safety and Efficacy of OGT Method Versus the Traditional Overlap Method
Introduction: The safety and efficiency of OGT-assisted method have not yet been compared with conventional overlap approach. Methods Retrospectively analyses the data of 155 gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy by conventional(conventional group, n=83) or OGT-assisted (OGT group, n=72) overlap methods at Nanfang Hospital. The anastomotic efficiency and surgical outcomes were compared between two groups.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The UGIRA International Registry for RAMIG for Gastric Cancer#1162382
- Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomy Compared on Short and Long Term Outcomes#895622
- Innovations in Gastric Cancer Surgery During Early Minimally Invasive Era and Future Perspectives.#399641
- Severe Complications After Gastrectomy for Esophagogastric Junction and Gastric Cancer#888343
- Comparison of Double-tract and Tubular Gastric Anastomosis in Proximal Gastric Cancer#896383
Record · ID 911885
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive